This The 21st year: transcription, motif list, and relation score readme.txt file was generated on 2021-01-29 by Claire H. C. Chang

GENERAL INFORMATION

1. Title of Dataset: 
The 21st year: transcription, motif list, and relation score

2. Author Information
	A. Principal Investigator Contact Information
		Name: Chang, Claire H. C.
		Institution: Princeton Neuroscience Institute
		Address: Princeton Neuroscience Institute
		Email: huichuan@princeton.edu

	B. Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information
		Name: Lazaridi, Christina
		Institution: School of the Arts, Columbia University, New York
		Address: -
		Email: lazaridi@princeton.edu


3. Date of data collection: 2016-03-01~2020-11-01

4. Geographic location of data collection: 
The fMRI participants' responses to the relation test were collected at Princeton University.
The relation scores were collected online. All the raters were in the U.S.

5. Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data: 
This study is supported by a Magic Grant from Princeton’s Humanities Council, Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (105-2917-I-564-007), and by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH112357). 

SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION

1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data: 
The copyright holder for this story, "The 21st year", is Christina Lazaridi.

2. Links to publications that cite or use the data: 
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.16.908731v2

3. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: 
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.16.908731v2

4. Links/relationships to ancillary data sets: 
The fMRI data and the auditory story used in this study are also publicly available on OpenNeuro: https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds002245.

5. Was data derived from another source? no

6. Recommended citation for this dataset: 
Claire H. C. Chang, Christina Lazaridi, Yaara Yeshurun, Kenneth A. Norman, U. H. (2021). The 21st year: transcription, motif list, and relation score [Data set]. Princeton University. https://doi.org/10.34770/XFW5-Y831

DATA & FILE OVERVIEW

1. File List: 
story_transcription.csv (the transcription of the auditory story, "The 21st year", which was used in this study as stimulus).  
motif_list.csv (the list of motifs that were embedded in the story to create relations between separate events).
relation_test.csv  (the test used to evaluate the 25 fMRI participants' understanding of the relations created by the motifs).
relation_score.csv (the relation score, averaged across 5 independent raters).

2. Relationship between files, if important: 
as described above

3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: 
The fMRI data and the auditory story used in this study have also been publicly released as part of the "Narratives" collection on OpenNeuro: https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds002245. The data corresponding to this study are indicated using the "21st year" task label. Raw MRI data are formatted according to the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) with exhaustive metadata. These data can be cited using the following reference: Nastase, S. A., Liu, Y.-F., Hillman, H., Zadbood, A., Hasenfratz, L., Keshavarzian, N., Chen, J., Honey, C. J., Yeshurun, Y., Regev, M., Nguyen, M., Chang, C. H. C., Baldassano, C. B., Lositsky, O., Simony, E., Chow, M. A., Leong, Y. C., Brooks, P. P., Micciche, E., Choe, G., Goldstein, A., Halchenko, Y. O., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. Narratives: fMRI data for evaluating models of naturalistic language comprehension. 

The mapping between subject IDs is as below:
Princeton DataSpace 	OpenNeuro
1	sub-254
2	sub-256
3	sub-259
4	sub-244
5	sub-190
6	sub-262
7	sub-263
8	sub-249
9	sub-266
10	sub-235
11	sub-075
12	sub-201
13	sub-270
14	sub-131
15	sub-268
16	sub-260
17	sub-257
18	sub-258
19	sub-255
20	sub-271
21	sub-265
22	sub-264
23	sub-269
24	sub-267
25	sub-261

4. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? no

METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION

1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: 
The relation test and the rating were performed using Qualtrics (Provo, UT). 
The raters were asked to judge whether the fMRI participants responded by remembering events from different parts of the story  (yes: 1, no: 0). 
For details, see also: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.16.908731v2

2. Methods for processing the data:  
The relation scores were generated by averaging ratings across raters. 

3. Instrument- or software-specific information needed to interpret the data: 
N/A

4. Standards and calibration information, if appropriate: 
N/A

5. Environmental/experimental conditions: 
N/A

6. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: 
N/A

7. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis, and/or submission: 
The story and motif list were created by Christina Lazaridi.
The relation test was performed by Claire H. C. Chang and Yaara Yeshurun.
The ratings were collected by Claire H. C. Chang.
Claire H. C. Chang processed and analyzed the relation score. 
Claire H. C. Chang submitted this data set. 

DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: relation_score.csv
1. Number of variables: 
14 out of the 28 motifs were included in the relation test. 

2. Number of cases/rows: 
25 fMRI participants were included.

3. Variable List: 
relation score, averaged across 5 independent raters. 

4. Missing data codes: 
There is no missing relation score.

5. Specialized formats or other abbreviations used: 
N/A